predecessor capabilities

The term "predecessor business capability" isn't a universally defined concept in business capability management. However, there are two possible interpretations depending on the context:

1. Capability Evolution (Less Common):

• This interpretation suggests a scenario where a business capability has evolved or been replaced by a new and improved version. The new capability would then be considered the successor, and the original one, the predecessor.

  • Here's an example:

    • Predecessor Capability: Manual Order Processing

    • Successor Capability: Automated Order Processing System

  • In this case, the organization might have transitioned from a manual system for processing orders (predecessor) to a more efficient automated system (successor).

  • It's important to note that this approach is less common. Business capabilities are often viewed as ongoing functionalities, and changes are typically reflected in updates or improvements to the existing capability description.

2. Capability Dependencies (More Common):

• A more prevalent way to understand relationships between business capabilities is through dependencies. This acknowledges that some capabilities act as a foundation or prerequisite for others. In this context, the upstream capability that provides the groundwork can be considered a predecessor to the downstream capability that relies on it.

  • Example:

    • Predecessor Capability (Upstream): Product Development

    • Dependent Capability (Downstream): Manufacturing

  • Here, Product Development (predecessor) lays the groundwork by designing and specifying new products. Manufacturing (dependent capability) relies on these specifications to produce the actual products.

  • This approach aligns better with the concept of ongoing functionalities. The capabilities themselves remain distinct, but their relationship highlights the order of execution.

Key Points:

• "Predecessor business capability" is not a standard term in business capability management.

• It might refer to an earlier version of a capability that has been replaced (less common).

• It can also signify an upstream capability that provides essential groundwork for a downstream capability (more common).

The most appropriate interpretation depends on the specific context and how your organization approaches business capability relationships.